dodgergirl
Administrator
[M:0]
lakers CHAMPS(: ; dodgers best record in mlb ;)
Posts: 645
|
Post by dodgergirl on Jul 3, 2009 2:55:47 GMT -5
artest to siqn with the lakers for 3 years, 18 million./: ariza to aqree with the rockets for a multi-year deal. any thouqhts on this..? hoenstly; im really mad; i really wanted them to have the same team backk; and i really dislike artest; come on; he almost started a fiqht with kobe! and wow; ariza did so muchh for the lakers in the playoffs with those key steals; and i mean; wow; its like they basically chose him over ariza. i hope to qod; that they still siqn odom.. but wow HUGE loss.
|
|
|
Post by bryce harper on Jul 3, 2009 8:21:50 GMT -5
practicaly a trade
|
|
Josh
Administrator
[M:0]
Posts: 1,949
|
Post by Josh on Jul 3, 2009 13:38:43 GMT -5
Yeah, I was thinking that as well. Artest is the better player no doubt, but his character is obviously questionable (looking back at the detroit incident and others). With that being said, I wonder which of the two is better to have on your team. I still think maybe Artest, as he is clearly better. He's a very good defender. I do like Ariza though, I was very mad when they traded Ariza for Steve Francis, and we all know how that deal went. I don't think you should be upset about this being a Lakers fan based upon playing ability, which you seem to be. Artest is clearly a better player, and he will contribute more, despite the fact Ariza did contribute a lot. Artest is good at running the floor, he's a decent shot blocker/alterer, he's a very good defender, and he's an even better scorer.
|
|