|
|
Post by scott on Jul 8, 2008 9:03:15 GMT -5
Yeah it doesn't show anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeefreak211 on Jul 8, 2008 9:11:15 GMT -5
|
|
Ryan
Super Star
[M:0:0:0:][M:0]
99%
Stanley. Cup. Champs!
Posts: 605
|
Post by Ryan on Jul 8, 2008 10:20:44 GMT -5
thje dodgers will be getting jack wilson.
and hopefully the pirates will get matt kemp but nady might need inculded or something
|
|
|
|
Post by scott on Jul 8, 2008 11:12:17 GMT -5
Pirates said they aren't trading Wilson
Despite rumors that the Dodgers are pursuing him, the Pittsburgh Post Gazette reports that "the Pirates expect to keep shortstop Jack Wilson beyond" the trading deadline.
The Pirates can say whatever they want for now, but Wilson is owed $7.25 million next season with an $8.4 million team option for 2010, so if they can find a team willing to give up a decent prospect for him a deal makes all kinds of sense. The newspaper speculates that Xavier Nady and Damaso Marte are "the most likely Pirates to get traded."
|
|
Ryan
Super Star
[M:0:0:0:][M:0]
99%
Stanley. Cup. Champs!
Posts: 605
|
Post by Ryan on Jul 8, 2008 13:34:51 GMT -5
What about jason bay? We have steve pearce andrew mccutchen and bay/mcclouuth next year.
They should trade bay or mcclouth for some really good prospects.
|
|
dodgergirl
Administrator 
[M:0]
lakers CHAMPS(: ; dodgers best record in mlb ;)
Posts: 645
|
Post by dodgergirl on Jul 8, 2008 17:25:31 GMT -5
that's weird. i can see it perfectly.
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeeboy on Jul 8, 2008 21:45:34 GMT -5
Trade Mclouth?  That would be the dumbest thing ever, |
|
|
|
Post by yankeefreak211 on Jul 9, 2008 9:24:41 GMT -5
hmm I wonder about bay
|
|
Ryan
Super Star
[M:0:0:0:][M:0]
99%
Stanley. Cup. Champs!
Posts: 605
|
Post by Ryan on Jul 9, 2008 11:47:13 GMT -5
Trade Mclouth? That would be the dumbest thing ever, not if we get good talent in return |
|
Mike
Single A
Posts: 176
|
Post by Mike on Jul 9, 2008 12:23:01 GMT -5
What about jason bay? We have steve pearce andrew mccutchen and bay/mcclouuth next year. They should trade bay or mcclouth for some really good prospects. Are you insane? Why in the world would they trade McLouth? Wilson and Bay are not being traded this year. Nady might be gone though, which leaves one spot in the OF for Pearce or Cutch. |
|
|
|
Post by yankeeboy on Jul 9, 2008 13:14:42 GMT -5
Why would the Dodgers want Jack Wilsomn, when they have Furcal? One of the top 10 SS in the league
|
|
Mike
Single A
Posts: 176
|
Post by Mike on Jul 9, 2008 13:32:41 GMT -5
Why would the Dodgers want Jack Wilsomn, when they have Furcal? One of the top 10 SS in the league I believe he's hurt. |
|
|
|
Post by yankeeboy on Jul 9, 2008 13:36:10 GMT -5
Oh
|
|
Ryan
Super Star
[M:0:0:0:][M:0]
99%
Stanley. Cup. Champs!
Posts: 605
|
Post by Ryan on Jul 9, 2008 13:49:29 GMT -5
What about jason bay? We have steve pearce andrew mccutchen and bay/mcclouuth next year. They should trade bay or mcclouth for some really good prospects. Are you insane? Why in the world would they trade McLouth? Wilson and Bay are not being traded this year. Nady might be gone though, which leaves one spot in the OF for Pearce or Cutch. bay and nady might leave u havve no idea cutch and pearce both are in the bigs next year |
|
Mike
Single A
Posts: 176
|
Post by Mike on Jul 9, 2008 14:58:38 GMT -5
Are you insane? Why in the world would they trade McLouth? Wilson and Bay are not being traded this year. Nady might be gone though, which leaves one spot in the OF for Pearce or Cutch. bay and nady might leave u havve no idea cutch and pearce both are in the bigs next year There's no way they'd trade both. Nady will most likely leave at the deadline. Bay might be traded at the end of the year. McLouth is a lock for next year and most likely Bay and EITHER Cutch or Pearce. And if/when they trade Bay/Nady, they will not be focusing on trading for prospects. They need starting pitching more than anything. |
|
That would be the dumbest thing ever,
