Josh
Administrator 
[M:0]
Posts: 1,949
|
Post by Josh on Feb 1, 2009 23:20:35 GMT -5
They won 27-23. I picked them to win 20-17, so I was close, but still off. I wanted the Cardinals to win, however. Congrats to the Steelers, nonetheless. Holmes had a great game, and he deserved the MVP Award.
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesrthebest on Feb 2, 2009 22:58:17 GMT -5
I wanted the Cardinals to win with a game winning bomb to Larry Fitz.
|
|
Josh
Administrator
[M:0]
Posts: 1,949
|
Post by Josh on Feb 3, 2009 17:56:44 GMT -5
I wanted the Cardinals to win with a game winning bomb to Larry Fitz. If Warner didn't fumble, who knows what would have happened. Josh |
|
|
|
Post by Torii Hunter on Feb 5, 2009 17:07:00 GMT -5
I wanted the Cardinals to win with a game winning bomb to Larry Fitz. If Warner didn't fumble, who knows what would have happened. Josh That wasn't a fumble. His arm was past the 'half' mark to consider it a forward pass. The refs just weren't the greatest. They should have reviewed it and the Cardinals would have had another shot. |
|
Josh
Administrator
[M:0]
Posts: 1,949
|
Post by Josh on Feb 5, 2009 17:10:23 GMT -5
If Warner didn't fumble, who knows what would have happened. Josh That wasn't a fumble. His arm was past the 'half' mark to consider it a forward pass. The refs just weren't the greatest. They should have reviewed it and the Cardinals would have had another shot. While I see what you're saying, I think I'll disagree. Yes, his arm was past the half way mark. But, in order for it to be considered "arm-in-motion," the QB has to have full control of the ball which Warner did not. He had enough strength after it was hit to get the ball past the halfway mark, but you could already see that it was loose. |
|
|
|
Post by Torii Hunter on Feb 23, 2009 21:57:51 GMT -5
True, they still should have reviewed it anyway, just to make sure.
|
|
